Pelosi Must Honor Her Promise...
Jane Harman & Alcee HastingsBut it doesn't explain why Pelosi would choose to pass over Jane Harman for Hastings, who has a rather checkered past. It is a position of great sensitivity and they would have to justify giving this position to Hastings after Pelosi and her Democratic colleagues once voted to impeach and remove Hastings from the federal bench as a corrupt perjurer.
In 1988, the House approved 17 articles of impeachment against Hastings, who was then a federal district judge sitting in the Southern District of Florida. The congressional impeachment stemmed from his unsuccessful 1981 federal prosecution on charges that a lawyer named William Borders had solicited a $150,000 bribe on his behalf from Frank and Thomas Romano, two brothers convicted of racketeering whose sentencing came before Hastings. Borders, a longtime Hastings friend and a prominent African-American attorney, was found guilty and sent to prison.
Although a Miami jury acquitted Hastings of the bribery, despite much circumstantial evidence of his guilt, outraged judges in the 11th Circuit initiated disciplinary proceedings against him. They commissioned a special report on the Hastings case by former assistant attorney general John Doar, who found substantial evidence of his participation in the bribery scheme with Borders as well as reason to believe that he had subsequently lied under oath at his trial.
As for Harman, she faces a significant handicap aside from the enmity of the new speaker and her alleged coziness with Republicans. She is reportedly the subject of a federal investigation concerning her relationship with the powerful lobbyists at the American Israel Public Affairs Committee. In a probe that grew out of the Larry Franklin espionage case, Harman is alleged to have promised to seek leniency for two AIPAC officials in exchange for the powerful lobby's support of her bid for the HPSCI chair. She vehemently denies that accusation.
The chairmanship of a select committee is not an entitlement, and grave doubts about the integrity of Hastings should disqualify him. Fortunately, the choice is not limited to Hastings or Harman. Among the possible alternatives is Rush Holt, D-N.J., a physicist and former State Department intelligence officer who is not only highly qualified to chair HPSCI but also has served on the committee with distinction. His honesty has never been questioned. For this job, above all others, Pelosi should honor her campaign promises and choose the best.
Rush Holt is the right person for this position and we may have to find a way to contact our lady speaker-elect to get on the ball and do the honorable thing and marry the best man to this most important position. One can only hope they will be wise enough to think this through.
cross-posted @ Blanton's & Ashton's















To choose Holt would surely bring an end to this cat fight business that the right is enjoying so much and it would also save face for Pelosi. This is her chance to get it right and also do the wisest thing.
Posted by
pissed off patricia |
6:48 AM
Thanks for the info, Sumo. It sounds like Holt is a viable alternative.
Posted by
John Good |
8:15 AM
Spread the word...
Posted by
Frederick |
11:48 AM
I have read about Holt elsewhere, he seems like a viable compromise based on experience and knowledge rather than politics.
Posted by
Lew Scannon |
12:01 PM
Hastings should be held to the same standard as Murtha when it comes to the shit sticking to him.
Posted by
Unknown |
12:11 PM
Holt sounds good. His name is easier to pronounce. And he is smiling in the picture which is always a good sign, ha,ha..
Posted by
Anonymous |
4:14 PM
I'm just waiting for the scandal baton to be tossed back to the Dems. Every so many years, we wait for the party that hasn't been in power (and thus the spotlight) to rescue us from the majority, and our rescuers always end up putting us right back at square one. It's hard to put any hope in politicians anymore.
Posted by
Unknown |
7:39 PM
First Murtha and now Hastings. I think Nancy should stop grinding axes and get on with the governing. These side trips aren't helping what will surely be an already difficult situation.
Posted by
Omnipotent Poobah |
8:53 PM
Excellent, excellent points, my friend. I had heard, however, that this Pelosi/Harmon feud was more media created than actual. We won't really know until the Dems take over in January. I agree that Hastings is not the best choice whatever the circumstances. The questions dogging his past are legitimate ones; unlike Murtha who wasn't indicted over the ABSCAM sting. I'll admit the tape in which he declines the bribe raises many questions – but he has avoided any semblance of scandal sine then - making me willing to give him the benefit of my doubt. Hastings claims similar circumstances - but even if he's right in his assertion of being targeted without merit - the attached scandal would render him a natural target for media bashing - something the Dems need to avoid like acid if they are to govern. There will be enough roadblocks as it is.
Posted by
TFLS |
10:28 AM